Architects vs. Self-Claimed Architects: A Clear Distinction
In India, a landmark Supreme Court ruling has allowed individuals without formal architectural education to practice design. This decision has created confusion between qualified architects and self-claimed architects, also known as architectural designers. These individuals, often civil engineers or contractors, operate without formal training or licensure. While they might appear similar on the surface, there are significant differences in their qualifications, responsibilities, and the quality of their work. Let’s dive deeper into this comparison.
Who is an Architect?
A licensed architect is a professional who has undergone extensive training in architecture, urban planning, and building sciences. They are legally authorized to practice and are accountable for the safety, functionality, and design of a project.
Key Traits of an Architect
Formal Education and Expertise
Architects possess a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Architecture from recognized institutions.
Their training includes sustainable design, structural engineering, aesthetic design, and building services like HVAC and electrical systems.
Architects excel in creating designs that prioritize functionality, aesthetics, and user comfort while adhering to building bylaws.
Legal Recognition
COA licensure allows architects to stamp and approve drawings required for municipal building permits.
Architects are bound by COA’s code of ethics, ensuring accountability and high professional standards.
Comprehensive Scope of Work
Architects oversee every phase of a project, from conceptualization to completion, including construction drawings, project management, and material selection.
They ensure regulatory compliance, structural safety, and alignment with client requirements.
Client Protection
Registered architects are accountable to COA, ensuring clients receive professional service.
Their designs are rooted in sustainability, safety, and long-term usability.
Who are Self-Claimed Architects?
Self-claimed architects, often referred to as architectural designers, lack the formal qualifications, licensure, and legal recognition required to practice architecture. They are usually civil engineers, contractors, or individuals with limited design knowledge, operating in an unregulated manner.
Key Characteristics of Self-Claimed Architects
Limited or No Formal Training
These professionals lack expertise in building science, sustainable design, or aesthetic principles.
Their work often prioritizes cost-cutting over functionality and compliance.
No Legal Authority
They cannot prepare or stamp sanction drawings, making their designs ineligible for building permits.
Their projects may not comply with building codes or safety regulations.
Focus on Execution, Not Design
Self-claimed architects emphasize construction execution and turnkey solutions, often at the expense of design quality.
Their work may lead to unauthorized construction or legal complications.
Lack of Accountability
Operating without oversight from bodies like COA, they cannot be held liable for errors or non-compliance.
Key Differences: Architect vs. Self-Claimed Architect
Aspect
Architect
Self-Claimed Architect
Education
Degree in architecture with expertise in design, science, and aesthetics
Limited or no formal design education
Legal Authority
Licensed by Council of Architecture (COA)
No licensure
Scope of Work
Handles design, safety, project management, and compliance
Focuses on construction execution
Accountability
Governed by COA’s code of ethics
No professional liability
Client Protection
High level of accountability, ensuring compliance and safety
Limited protections
Risks of Hiring Self-Claimed Architects
While self-claimed architects may appear cost-effective, their unregulated practice can lead to serious consequences:
Compromised Structural Safety Without formal training, their designs may lack structural integrity, posing safety risks.
Code Violations Non-compliance with building bylaws can result in hefty fines and legal issues.
Subpar Design Quality Their designs may lack functionality, sustainability, or aesthetic appeal, leading to long-term dissatisfaction.
No Accountability In the absence of COA oversight, clients have no recourse in case of disputes or project failures.
Why Choose a Licensed Architect?
Collaborating with a licensed architect ensures:
Design Excellence: Architects create designs that blend sustainability, aesthetics, and practicality.
Regulatory Compliance: Their work adheres to all building codes and safety regulations.
Project Management: Architects coordinate with contractors, engineers, and stakeholders, minimizing errors and delays.
Client Protection: Licensed architects are accountable for their work, offering peace of mind to clients.
Challenges Posed by Self-Claimed Architects in India
The widespread practice of self-claimed architects has led to several challenges:
Undercutting By offering lower fees, they attract clients who may not be aware of the risks.
Devaluation of the Profession The lack of regulation undermines public trust in licensed architects.
Quality Issues Their projects often lack durability and aesthetic value, resulting in long-term costs for clients.
Conclusion
The difference between licensed architects and self-claimed architects lies in their qualifications, legal recognition, and accountability. Hiring a licensed architect ensures compliance with legal standards, professional excellence, and long-term value.
While self-claimed architects may offer cheaper solutions, the risks associated with their unregulated practices far outweigh the benefits. For any architectural project, partnering with a COA-registered architect guarantees safety, quality, and peace of mind.
Bultdesign
The Builtdesign team publishes content to make consumers aware of the industry. Our articles also focus on helping the community learn about recent trends.